-
Tension: Many adults raised by emotionally cold parents struggle with closeness, despite appearing independent and self-sufficient.
-
Noise: Cultural narratives equate emotional distance with strength and resilience, masking underlying emotional wounds.
-
Direct Message: Independence shaped by emotional neglect is not true strength—it’s often a survival response in disguise.
To learn more about our editorial approach, explore The Direct Message methodology.
When I met “Elena,” she was everything a modern adult was supposed to be: calm, competent, and impressively unbothered. She never cried in public, never vented about her partner, and once told me—only half-jokingly—that her childhood was so “efficient” she barely remembered it.
It took me a while to notice the silences between her sentences. The ones where an emotional detail should have gone. I later learned she was raised by parents who never yelled, but also never hugged. Her achievements were acknowledged with a nod, her pain with a shrug.
I’ve seen this pattern often in my research on digital well-being—especially in online forums where people raised by emotionally cold or uncringingly stoic parents ask, Why do I feel so distant from people, even the ones I love?
This article is for them. It’s for anyone who learned early that emotional safety couldn’t be assumed, only earned. For anyone who’s been called “strong” for not needing much, when in fact, they learned not to need at all.
Performing adulthood without a template for warmth
Elena isn’t alone. Adults raised by emotionally unavailable parents often appear remarkably independent on the outside. They manage their own lives, rarely ask for help, and maintain a steady calm that others admire.
But beneath that self-reliance, many of them struggle with things that are invisible at first glance: discomfort with vulnerability, a tendency to dismiss emotional needs, or feeling out of sync in close relationships.
This isn’t just personal—it’s patterned.
Psychologists like Lindsay Gibson, author of Adult Children of Emotionally Immature Parents, explain how children of emotionally cold parents often develop what’s known as “emotional loneliness.” They grow up with their basic needs met—food, shelter, education—but not their emotional ones. There’s no outright abuse, no chaos—just a void. A blank where connection should be.
Over time, many of these children learn that expressing need is either ignored or subtly discouraged. So they do what smart kids do: adapt. They stop expressing. They stop expecting. And they become very good at not needing anyone.
The result? Adulthood performances that look like self-sufficiency but feel like isolation.
Why society keeps misreading this
Here’s where it gets complicated. The world often praises this kind of emotional self-containment.
We live in a culture that lionizes stoicism—especially in the UK, where “keep calm and carry on” has become both a meme and a mindset. Media narratives around “resilience” often celebrate people who power through hardship without flinching. But this can distort what healthy emotional regulation really looks like.
As I’ve observed in my research on media narratives and digital well-being, there’s a subtle cultural pressure—amplified by online discourse—to perform strength, not process emotions. The quieter someone is about their feelings, the more admirable they’re often perceived to be.
But emotional detachment isn’t always resilience. Sometimes it’s unacknowledged harm.
Conventional wisdom might say: “They turned out fine—look how capable they are!” But “fine” is not the same as fulfilled. What looks like composure might be dissociation. What seems like independence could actually be a lack of trust that anyone will truly show up.
And in a media ecosystem where “strong and silent” is portrayed as the gold standard, it’s easy to miss the cost of that silence.
The insight that changes everything
Emotional independence shaped by neglect is not resilience—it’s a protective shell. True strength includes the capacity to connect, not just cope.
What healing looks like when you were taught not to feel
If this resonates with you, here’s what healing doesn’t look like: suddenly becoming emotionally open, asking for hugs, or calling your parents to discuss your unmet childhood needs.
Instead, it’s often quieter. More subtle. And deeply internal.
It might look like noticing when you feel slightly numb instead of connected, and pausing to name the feeling rather than push it away. It might mean recognizing that your reluctance to open up isn’t a personality trait—it’s a scar. A logical, brilliant adaptation to a home that didn’t reward openness.
Relearning emotional safety is like rebuilding muscle after an injury. It’s slow, and it feels awkward at first. You may overcorrect, speak too much, cry unexpectedly. You might find yourself overwhelmed by the very thing you longed for: closeness.
One micro-habit I’ve seen work well, especially among people raised in emotionally minimalist homes, is “one honest check-in per day.” Just one sentence. Spoken aloud. Texted to a friend. Written in a journal. Something real like: “I felt alone at lunch today.” Or, “I wanted to say I was hurt, but didn’t.”
These small acts of honesty rewire the belief that emotional needs are burdens. They help you inhabit your life—not just manage it.
And sometimes, it’s these small shifts that bring us closer to the kind of adult we were never shown how to be.
