This article was originally published in 2001 and was last updated on June 11th, 2025.
- Tension: Brands want to connect authentically with teens but struggle to balance empowerment with subtle selling.
- Noise: Debates about platform coolness and chatroom safety obscured the deeper opportunity to co-create brand spaces with youth.
- Direct Message: P&G’s 2001 launch of Toejam wasn’t just an experiment in teen engagement—it was an early glimpse of community-led brand-building, still relevant in today’s creator economy.
To learn more about our editorial approach, explore The Direct Message methodology.
In 2001, Procter & Gamble launched Toejam.com, a Southern California-based test site for teen girls. On paper, it looked like branded content dressed up as community: a place to submit poems, win prizes, and learn about life—with a side of Noxzema, Crest Whitening Strips, and Cover Girl.
But in retrospect, Toejam was less about product placement and more about platform design. P&G invited an advisory board of teen girls to co-develop the name (an acronym for Teens Openly Expressing Just About Me) and contribute content. The site wasn’t controlled—it was co-authored.
That was rare then. And valuable now.
Toejam emerged before “creator” was a job title, before social media was algorithmically driven. It offered a place for teens to self-publish, interact, and express.
Even the marketing language on the site signaled empowerment: “They don’t control us… we’re free to do our own thing.”
That kind of agency, whether real or moderated, pointed to a shift in how brands could work with—not just talk at—younger consumers. It laid early groundwork for modern practices like influencer seeding, ambassador programs, and UGC-led campaigns.
Why the tension still applies
P&G wanted to reach a generation gaining purchasing power—but also self-awareness. Teens were influencing family buying decisions and building their own media habits.
Yet the brand couldn’t come on too strong. It had to participate in culture without overtly steering it.
The result? A deliberately light-touch brand presence.
Critics at the time argued that sponsors were hard to find. Others noted the lack of chatrooms as a missing engagement hook.
But that restraint—and the wariness around unmoderated discussion—came from experience.
P&G had recently shuttered Swizzle, a UK teen site, due to parent backlash over inappropriate chatroom content. In Toejam, it opted for safer modes of interaction: poetry contests, friend-forwardable postcards, and sponsored events that required photo processing through partners like Longs Drugs.
That tension between control and authenticity hasn’t gone away. Today, marketers still wrestle with how much freedom to offer users—and how much brand scaffolding to keep visible.
The noise that buried the signal
Much of the early reaction to Toejam focused on its viability against competitors like Alloy and Bolt. Those sites felt broader, edgier, more portal-like. Analysts asked: Could a single brand-driven experience compete with the open web?
But that was the wrong lens. Toejam wasn’t trying to be a teen version of Yahoo. It was testing intimacy at scale. It was a brand exploring how community, expression, and commerce might coexist—years before Instagram would make that mainstream.
Toejam also reflected an early form of what we now call zero-party data collection. Every submission, every contest entry, every preference shared voluntarily was a signal—one marketers today would call gold.
The skepticism about Toejam’s “stickiness” missed a bigger shift. P&G didn’t just advertise to teens—it studied how they wanted to interact with brands. That learning cycle, not the traffic numbers, was the real asset.
The clarity that changes everything
Toejam wasn’t about selling more toothpaste—it was about learning how young consumers want to shape their own narrative, with brands playing a supporting role.
The long tail of early co-creation
If Toejam launched today, it would likely be a micro-community on Discord, a series of collaborative TikTok challenges, or a co-authored Substack. But the core idea remains powerful: let your audience co-create, and their loyalty becomes less transactional and more tribal.
Lessons marketers can still apply:
1. Involve your audience early.
Toejam’s name, content themes, and user experience came from teen input. That level of inclusion builds both relevance and resilience.
2. Build for contribution, not consumption.
The site wasn’t just a resource—it was a canvas. In a world of passive scroll, opportunities to create still stand out.
3. Respect the line between expression and exploitation.
Letting users speak authentically while keeping brand presence subtle is tricky—but essential. Toejam walked that line better than many realize.
4. Don’t confuse quiet engagement with failure.
Just because users aren’t in chatrooms doesn’t mean they aren’t connecting. Submission-based interaction remains viable, especially with safety-conscious demos.
5. Remember: cultural capital ages differently.
What feels cringeworthy in one decade may look visionary in another. The hindsight on Toejam proves that.
What brand builders can do now
The landscape has changed since Toejam.com quietly folded—but the opportunity for culturally attuned, co-created brand platforms is bigger than ever.
The rise of Gen Z (and now Gen Alpha) has shifted the focus from polished content to participatory spaces where expression, identity, and micro-communities thrive.
If P&G were launching Toejam in 2025, it wouldn’t need to build a standalone site from scratch. It could partner with Roblox, integrate with BeReal, or embed brand-backed prompts into creative AI tools teens already use.
But the strategy would remain the same: invite teens into the build process, not just the launch party.
Here’s what modern brand builders can take forward:
- Start small, but build modular. Let users guide what grows. Launch with a simple content loop—then open space for audience expansion.
- Use paid media to seed—not dominate—community. Don’t just advertise your platform. Show how others are shaping it.
- Design for psychological safety. Toejam avoided chatrooms out of caution. Today, tech has evolved, but the need for careful moderation and inclusive UX is still paramount.
- Embrace brand humility. Sponsor lightly. Show up helpfully. Let the community’s creativity lead. That’s what builds affinity that outlasts product cycles.
The platforms change, but the principle stays: when you let your audience shape the space, they’ll give you something better than clicks. They’ll give you cultural permission.
Conclusion: From novelty to playbook
Toejam.com may have faded from memory, but its DNA runs through today’s most successful brand communities. It saw teens not just as buyers, but as collaborators. It valued content creation over content control. And it treated brand relevance as something earned—not imposed.
In a digital culture where participation is power, that lesson has never felt more timely. What looked like an odd brand experiment in 2001 reads now like a blueprint for the age of co-creation.
