Introduction
A candidate from Vancouver Island for the People’s Party of Canada, David Hilderman, has been instructed by a B.C. Supreme Court judge to cease referring to himself as an engineer. Although Hilderman possesses a university degree in engineering, he is not a licensed professional engineer. The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of B.C. examined Hilderman’s assertions during the election campaign and consistently asked him to stop using the title, but he declined. This decision was made after the association concluded that Hilderman’s usage of the title could potentially mislead the public regarding his qualifications and professional status. The judge’s order serves as a stern reminder of the importance of accurately presenting one’s credentials, especially in a public and political context.
Justice Jan Brongers’ ruling
Justice Jan Brongers determined that Hilderman violated regulations by using the engineer title while also mentioning his applied science degree and discussing his work experience in the electronics sector. On Dec. 1, Brongers issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Hilderman from using the title of an engineer or any other title that implies he is a registered professional engineer. This ruling serves as a significant reminder of the importance of professional licensing and the potential legal consequences for those who misrepresent their qualifications. The decision highlights the need for individuals to accurately represent their credentials and adhere to the regulatory requirements of their respective professions.
Hilderman’s stance
Although he abides by the court’s decision, Hilderman thinks the rules surrounding the term “engineer” are ridiculous and believes he should be allowed to use his educational title. He argues that the strict regulations concerning the use of the term negate the hard work and dedication that goes into obtaining an engineering degree. Additionally, Hilderman emphasizes the importance of recognizing one’s expertise and knowledge in their respective field, regardless of stringent legal technicalities.
Professional association’s perspective
The professional association explains that while “engineer” is not a protected title under B.C. law, it can be misused if the context implies the person is a registered professional engineer. This potentially leads to confusion and misrepresentation of the individual’s qualifications and skills in the field. It is therefore essential for both employers and clients to verify the professional credentials of anyone claiming to be an engineer before engaging in any projects or services to ensure the quality and safety of the work.
Escalation and court involvement
Hilderman initially agreed to stop using the title but later changed his mind, resulting in further correspondence and eventually the court’s involvement. As the dispute escalated, both parties sought legal recourse to defend their respective claims to the title. This led to a protracted battle in court, revealing the complexities of intellectual property rights and stirring up debates on the legitimacy of owning such titles.
Contemplating appeal and changes in law
Hilderman, who is required to pay legal fees, is contemplating appealing but also expressed interest in seeing changes in B.C. law concerning safeguards for engineering titles, citing a recent exemption for the title “software engineer” in Alberta. He believes that implementing similar exemptions for other engineering titles could help protect industry professionals while still ensuring public safety. As a result, Hilderman urges relevant stakeholders, such as professional bodies and regulators, to review and consider modifications to the current laws in British Columbia.
First Reported on: cbc.ca
FAQ
Why has David Hilderman been instructed to stop using the title of “engineer”?
David Hilderman has been ordered to stop referring to himself as an engineer because he is not a licensed professional engineer. A B.C. Supreme Court judge ruled that his usage of the title could potentially mislead the public regarding his qualifications and professional status.
What did Justice Jan Brongers decide in this case?
Justice Jan Brongers determined that Hilderman violated regulations by using the engineer title while also mentioning his applied science degree and discussing his work experience in the electronics sector. As a result, Brongers issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Hilderman from using the title of an engineer or any other title that implies he is a registered professional engineer.
What is Hilderman’s stance on the ruling?
Hilderman thinks the rules surrounding the term “engineer” are ridiculous and believes he should be allowed to use his educational title. He argues that the strict regulations concerning the use of the term negate the hard work and dedication that goes into obtaining an engineering degree. Despite disagreeing with the ruling, Hilderman abides by the court’s decision.
Why is the professional association concerned about the use of the “engineer” title?
The professional association is concerned because, while “engineer” is not a protected title under B.C. law, it can be misused if the context implies the person is a registered professional engineer. This potentially leads to confusion and misrepresentation of the individual’s qualifications and skills in the field. Verifying professional credentials is essential to ensure the quality and safety of work.
What led to the court’s involvement in this case?
Hilderman initially agreed to stop using the title but later changed his mind, resulting in further correspondence and eventually the court’s involvement. As the dispute escalated, both parties sought legal recourse to defend their respective claims to the title, leading to a protracted battle in court.
Is Hilderman considering an appeal or changes in law?
Hilderman is contemplating appealing the decision and has expressed interest in seeing changes in B.C. law concerning safeguards for engineering titles. He cites a recent exemption for the title “software engineer” in Alberta and believes similar exemptions could protect industry professionals while ensuring public safety. Hilderman urges relevant stakeholders to review and consider modifications to current laws in British Columbia.
