What spending decades watching people navigate loss taught me about the one thing that actually helps and the many things people offer instead that don’t

The Direct Message

Tension: The funniest person in a friend group is often the one carrying the most unacknowledged pain, because their humor creates an illusion of resilience that prevents anyone from checking on them.

Noise: Society classifies humor as a ‘mature’ defense mechanism and celebrates those who wield it, conflating comedic skill with emotional well-being and rewarding the performance that keeps the real person invisible.

Direct Message: The joke was never about making people laugh — it was about making sure they stayed. And the only person who knows the difference between genuine resilience and skilled deflection is the one who can’t stop performing.

Every DMNews article follows The Direct Message methodology.

The morning after my mother died in 2015, I sat at my kitchen table surrounded by casseroles, sympathy cards, and the most uncomfortable silence I’d ever experienced. A neighbor had just left after telling me she knew exactly how I felt because her cat had died last year. Another friend had spent twenty minutes explaining the stages of grief, as if I could navigate loss like following a recipe. Everyone meant well. Almost nobody helped.

After 34 years in education — teaching high school English and counseling teenagers through their darkest moments — I thought I understood grief. I’d sat with students who’d lost parents, siblings, best friends. I’d written countless recommendation letters for kids who’d overcome unimaginable loss. But sitting in my own grief, I realized how much I’d gotten wrong, how many times I’d probably offered the very things that now felt so hollow when offered to me.

What I’ve learned since then, watching friends navigate their own losses and reflecting on decades of witnessing grief up close, is that we’ve built an entire culture around avoiding the one thing that actually helps. We’re so desperate to fix, to solve, to make it better that we miss what grieving people actually need.

The desperate need to fix what can’t be fixed

Think about the last time someone you cared about experienced a significant loss. What was your first instinct? If you’re like most of us, you immediately started searching for the right words, the perfect gesture, the thing that would somehow make it better. We send flowers, drop off food, share inspirational quotes, offer advice about moving forward. We do everything except the one thing that matters.

I watched this pattern repeat itself countless times in my teaching career. When a student lost someone, adults would swarm with solutions. Guidance counselors would hand out pamphlets about the grief process. Teachers would offer extensions and extra credit. Parents would schedule therapy appointments. Everyone was doing something, anything, to avoid simply being present with the pain.

The problem isn’t that we don’t care. It’s that we care so much we can’t bear to feel helpless. So we fill the space with action, with words, with well-meaning attempts to accelerate healing. We tell ourselves we’re helping, but often we’re just making ourselves feel better about our own discomfort with suffering.

Why presence beats every platitude

During my mother’s final months, when she was in hospice care, I learned something that contradicted everything I thought I knew about supporting someone through loss. The hospice volunteers who made the biggest difference weren’t the ones with the most training or the best advice. They were the ones who could simply sit in a room without needing to fill it with solutions.

One volunteer, an older woman who barely spoke, would just sit with my mother while I ran errands. She didn’t try to cheer her up, didn’t offer spiritual guidance, didn’t even make much conversation. She was just there, fully present, reading her book while my mother dozed. When I thanked her once, she said something I’ll never forget: “Honey, dying people don’t need our wisdom. They need our company.”

Megan Devine, author of “It’s OK Not to Be OK,” puts it perfectly: “Grief is not a problem to be solved; it’s an experience to be carried.” Yet everything in our culture pushes us toward problem-solving mode. We want timelines, stages, strategies. We want to believe that with the right approach, we can shepherd someone through grief efficiently and effectively.

But grief doesn’t work that way. It’s messy, nonlinear, and deeply personal. What helps one person might hurt another. The only universal truth I’ve found is that genuine presence — showing up without an agenda, without trying to fix or rush or advise — is the one gift that consistently helps.

The harmful myths we keep repeating

Remember when people used to say things like “God doesn’t give you more than you can handle” or “Everything happens for a reason”? We’ve mostly learned those phrases do more harm than good. But we’ve replaced them with new myths that are just as unhelpful, dressed up in psychological language that makes them seem more sophisticated.

The stages of grief might be the most damaging myth we perpetuate. People actually apologize for not grieving “correctly,” as if there’s a proper sequence to follow. I’ve had friends worry they’re stuck in anger or bargaining, as if grief is a video game where you need to unlock each level to progress.

Then there’s the timeline myth — the idea that grief should ease predictably over time. Six months, a year, two years max, and then you should be “over it.” I’m several years out from my mother’s death, and sometimes grief still catches me off guard in the grocery store when I see her favorite cookies. That’s not a failure of healing; that’s the nature of love that continues after loss.

We also love to categorize grief, as if losing a parent is fundamentally different from losing a job, a marriage, or a dream. But loss is loss. The teenager whose first love breaks up with them is experiencing real grief. The retiree mourning their sense of purpose after leaving their career is grieving too. When we minimize certain types of loss, we leave people feeling ashamed of their very real pain.

What actually helps (and why it’s so hard to do)

After decades of getting it wrong and finally learning what actually helps, here’s what I know: The most powerful thing you can do for someone who’s grieving is to show up consistently without trying to fix anything.

That might mean sending a text every few days that doesn’t require a response: “Thinking of you. No need to reply.” It might mean sitting with someone while they cry without offering tissues or telling them it’ll be okay. It might mean bringing dinner three months after the funeral when everyone else has moved on but the grief is still raw.

The reason this is so hard is that it requires us to tolerate our own discomfort. We have to resist our impulse to make things better, to offer solutions, to fill silence with platitudes. We have to accept that we can’t fix this, that our friend or family member is going to hurt, and all we can do is witness it.

I learned this lesson repeatedly during my teaching career, though I didn’t fully understand it until I experienced my own loss. The students who healed weren’t the ones who got the most resources or interventions. They were the ones who had at least one adult who could tolerate their pain without trying to rush them through it. Someone who could say, “This is awful, and I’m here” instead of “This too shall pass.”

Moving forward without moving on

Here’s what I wish someone had told me in those early days of grief: You don’t have to move on. You don’t have to find closure. You don’t have to reach some magical place where the loss no longer hurts. You just have to keep living, carrying the loss with you as you go.

The most helpful people in my grief journey were the ones who understood this. They didn’t push me toward acceptance or healing. They didn’t measure my progress or worry about my timeline. They simply walked alongside me, letting me be exactly where I was.

As I’ve settled into retirement, I’ve found myself drawn to supporting others through loss — not as a counselor or expert, but as someone who’s learned the value of showing up without an agenda. I’ve sat with former colleagues who’ve lost spouses, been present for neighbors navigating divorce, listened to friends whose adult children are struggling. I don’t offer advice unless explicitly asked. I don’t share inspirational quotes or recommend books about grief. I just show up, consistently and without judgment.

If you’re supporting someone through loss right now, I want you to know that your presence matters more than your words. Your consistency matters more than your solutions. Your ability to witness their pain without trying to fix it is the greatest gift you can offer. And if you’re the one grieving, know that anyone who truly helps will understand that grief isn’t something to overcome — it’s something to integrate into the fabric of who you’re becoming.

Picture of Bernadette Donovan

Bernadette Donovan

After three decades teaching English and working as a school guidance counsellor, Bernadette Donovan now channels classroom wisdom into essays on purposeful ageing and lifelong learning. She holds an M.Ed. in Counselling & Human Development from Boston College, is an ICF-certified Life Coach, and volunteers with the National Literacy Trust. Her white papers on later-life fulfilment circulate through regional continuing-education centres and have been referenced in internal curriculum guidelines for adult-learning providers. At DMNews she offers seasoned perspectives on wellness, retirement, and inter-generational relationships—helping readers turn experience into insight through the Direct Message lens. Bernadette can be contacted at [email protected].

MOST RECENT ARTICLES

How the modern parenting industry quietly made an entire generation of parents feel like they’re permanently failing at something previous generations never thought twice about

What happens to marketing jobs when AI handles most of the execution

I asked him not to post about the new relationship for a while out of basic decency and he posted a couple’s photo a month later — and I understood then that the cruelest thing technology does in a breakup is give the other person a megaphone you can’t turn off

I’m 67 and my doctor told me my cognitive scores were better than most 50-year-olds — and the only thing I did differently was never stop arguing with books

You don’t have an audience on X. You have borrowed access to one, and the terms keep changing.

The reason people who seem to have everything together on the outside are often the last ones anyone thinks to check on